Plate reconstruction of obscured views of a main imaging device using capture device inputs of the same scene

ABSTRACT

An imagery processing system obtains capture inputs from capture devices that might have capture parameters and characteristics that differ from those of a main imagery capture device. By normalizing outputs of those capture devices, potentially arbitrary capture devices could be used for reconstructing portions of a scene captured by the main imagery capture device when reconstructing a plate of the scene to replace an object in the scene with what the object obscured in the scene. Reconstruction could be of one main image, a stereo pair of images, or some number, N, of images where N&gt;2.

CROSS REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/146,093, entitled PLATE RECONSTRUCTION OF OBSCURED VIEWS OF CAPTURED IMAGERY USING ARBITRARY CAPTURED INPUTS, filed on Jan. 11, 2021, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/018,933, entitled RECONSTRUCTION OF OBSCURED VIEWS OF CAPTURED IMAGERY USING ARBITRARY CAPTURED INPUTS, filed on Sep. 11, 2020, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/983,528, entitled RECONSTRUCTION OF OBSCURED VIEWS OF CAPTURED IMAGERY USING ARBITRARY CAPTURED INPUTS, filed on Feb. 28, 2020, which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full in this application for all purposes.

This application is related to the following applications which are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full in this application for all purposes:

-   -   U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/018,960, entitled IMAGE         PROCESSING FOR REDUCING ARTIFACTS CAUSED BY REMOVAL OF SCENE         ELEMENTS FROM IMAGES, filed on Sep. 11, 2020;     -   U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/018,943, entitled         COMPUTER-GENERATED IMAGE PROCESSING INCLUDING VOLUMETRIC SCENE         RECONSTRUCTION, filed on Sep. 11, 2020; and     -   U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/018,948, entitled         RECONSTRUCTION OF OBSCURED VIEWS IN CAPTURED IMAGERY USING PIXEL         REPLACEMENT FROM SECONDARY IMAGERY, filed on Sep. 11, 2020.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure generally relates to digital image manipulation. The disclosure relates more particularly to apparatus and techniques for reconstructing portions of images obscured in a main image capture with inputs provided by other scene capture data.

BACKGROUND

In modern digital imagery creation (still images, video sequences of frames of images), there is often a desire to change from what is captured by a camera to convey something different. This might be the case where a camera captures a scene in which two actors are acting and later a content creator determines that the presence of one of the actors is to be removed from the captured video to result in a video sequence where the removed actor is not present and instead the video sequence shows what was behind the removed actor, a computer-generated character or object takes the place of the removed actor, or for other reasons.

Viewer expectations are that artifacts of the removal from a captured video sequence not be readily apparent. Simply removing the pixels corresponding to the removed character would leave a blank spot in the video. Simply replacing those pixels with a generic background would leave artifacts at the boundary between pixels that were part of the removed character and pixels nearby. With sufficient time, effort and computing power, an artist might manually “paint” the pixels in each frame of the video where the removed character was, but that can be time consuming and tedious to get it to where viewers do not perceive an artifact of the removal.

Tools for more simply performing manipulation of imagery data would be useful.

SUMMARY

An imagery processing system obtains capture inputs from capture devices that might have capture parameters and characteristics that differ from those of a main imagery capture device. By normalizing outputs of those capture devices, potentially arbitrary capture devices could be used for reconstructing portions of a scene captured by the main imagery capture device when reconstructing a plate of the scene to replace an object in the scene with what the object obscured in the scene. Reconstruction could be of one main image, a stereo pair of images, or some number, N, of images where N>2.

The following detailed description together with the accompanying drawings will provide a better understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure will be described with reference to the drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates an environment in which imagery and data about a scene might be captured, from a top view, according to various embodiments.

FIG. 2 illustrates a stage, from a top view, in which a scene is captured and has several possible plates of the scene that might be used in generating reconstructed imagery of what would be visible, according to various embodiments.

FIG. 3 is a side view of a scene that might include occlusions to be reconstructed, according to various embodiments.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a system for creating reconstructed imagery from captured imagery of a scene and arbitrary inputs captured from the scene, according to various embodiments.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a process for reconstructing imagery from captured imagery of a scene and arbitrary inputs captured from the scene, according to various embodiments.

FIG. 6 illustrates an example visual content generation system as might be used to generate imagery in the form of still images and/or video sequences of images, according to various embodiments.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating an example computer system upon which computer systems of the systems illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 6 may be implemented.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, various embodiments will be described. For purposes of explanation, specific configurations and details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments. However, it will also be apparent to one skilled in the art that the embodiments may be practiced without the specific details. Furthermore, well-known features may be omitted or simplified in order not to obscure the embodiment being described.

Techniques described and suggested herein include generating modified video from captured video of a scene and additional inputs related to the scene, where the modified video is digitally modified to replace all or portions of objects in the scene recorded in the captured video (i.e., “original video”). It should be understood that examples described with reference to video sequences can apply to single or still images, unless otherwise indicated. A scene might comprise various objects and actors appearing in the scene, possibly moving, possibly being subject to lighting changes and/or camera movements. Herein, where an object is described as including an object that is visible in the scene or not visible in the scene, the teaching might also apply to human and/or non-human actors. Thus, a step in a process that captures an image of a scene and then processes the digitally captured video to remove an actor from the scene and reconstruct what was supposed to be behind that actor might also be used for removing inanimate or non-actor objects from the scene.

Rationales for modifying a video post-capture can vary and many of the techniques described herein work well regardless of the rationale. One rationale is that a scene is to be captured with three actors interacting where one of the actors is outfitted with motion capture (“mo-cap”) fiducials (contrasting markers, paint, etc.) and the modified video will have a computer-generated character moving in the scene in place of the mo-cap actor, such as where the computer-generated character is a non-human character. Another rationale might be that a video of a scene is captured and in post-production, a director changes a plot and that change requires that some character or object not be present even though it is present in the original captured imagery. Yet another rationale is the discovery of filming errors that need to be corrected and a scene cannot be easily reshot.

In a more general case, one or more images are recreated, which could be from a reconstructed plate or a set of normalized, aligned planes from which an image can be reconstructed with objects filled in or removed.

FIG. 1 illustrates an environment in which imagery and data about a scene might be captured, from a top view, according to various embodiments. FIG. 1 is an approximately top view of a stage 102 on which there are actors 104 and 106 and other objects 108, 110, and 112. Action and the scene might be captured by camera 120, which might be movable on a track 122. A background wall 124 might provide content of the scene that is captured by camera 120, and a green screen 126 might also be present and visible in the scene. As is known, green screens can be added to scenes to facilitate the insertion of content into a frame where that content does not exist in the scene, but is added post-capture of the scene. Camera 120 might be a main camera, sometimes referred to as a “hero” camera, that is expected to capture the bulk of the scene. In some variations, multiple hero cameras are used to allow for cutting from one view of the scene to another quickly.

In the digital video captured by camera 120 (or later digitized video derived from analog filming of the scene), for the indicated position of camera 120 on track 122, actor 106 would be partially obscured in the video by actor 104 and object 110, while background wall 124 is partially obscured by object 112. To provide a director an option to cast the scene without actor 104 or object 112, the director could request that the entire scene be shot a second time without actor 104 and object 112, but often such decisions are not made until after the scene is shot and the actors, objects or environment may no longer be available. Artists could manually paint frames to remove an object, but that can be time consuming to get right.

To provide information for an automated plate reconstruction, additional devices might be deployed on or about stage 102 to gather data that can be used for reconstruction. For example, witness cameras 130, 132 might be deployed to capture black and white, high resolution, low resolution, infrared or other particular wavelengths and resolutions of what is happening in the scene. A Lidar or similar device 140 might also be deployed to capture point clouds of distances to objects.

Herein, a plate might be a planar surface (which might or might not relate to a physical surface) that intersects a view space of a camera. In FIG. 1, plates 150, 152 cross the view of camera 120. A plate 154 intersects a view from witness camera 132. Although, in this example, the plates in FIG. 1 are shown perpendicular to a central axis of a view frustum of camera 120, that need not be the case in other applications as plates can have other desired orientations. In some embodiments, a plate can have depth and can define a volume instead of, or in addition to, one or more planar surfaces. In general, operations and properties described herein for two-dimensional images may be applicable to three-dimensional volumes. For example, capturing, manipulating, rendering or otherwise processing two dimensional items, such as images, frames, pixels, etc.; can apply to three-dimensional items such as models, settings, voxels, etc. unless otherwise indicated.

It may be that a director or artist desires to use computerized imagery editing tools to edit captured video from camera 120 such that the plate of interest is plate 106. In that case, editing might involve not only removing pixels from frames that correspond to actor 104, but also filling in pixel color values for those pixels with what would have been captured by camera 120 for those pixels but for the obscuring effects of the opacity of actor 104 and object 110.

FIG. 2 illustrates a stage 202, from a top view, in which a scene is captured and has several possible plates 204(1)-(4) of the scene that might be used in generating reconstructed imagery of what would be visible and that uses various cameras. As illustrated, cameras 206(1)-(3) might be identically configured cameras, while camera 208 is configured differently. Such an arrangement, unless existing for other reasons, might make reconstruction impractical, whereas an arrangement of FIG. 1 might not add complexity if the various different capture devices are already in place for other reasons. In FIG. 2, camera 208 might be placed and optimized for motion capture of action on the stage, such as where one or more of objects 212(1)-(5) present on stage 202 is outfitted for motion capture. It can be efficient if inputs from camera 208 could be used for plate reconstruction, but quite often the information gathered, sensitivity, position, lighting, etc. are uncoordinated with those elements of cameras 206(1)-206(3).

FIG. 3 is a side view of a scene that might include occlusions to be reconstructed. In a captured scene 302, a person 304 is between house 306 and a camera that captured the image. A plate reconstruction process might be used to generate, from a video sequence that includes person 304 walking in front of house 306, a reconstructed video of a plate that is behind person 304 so that, for example, the reconstructed video would display a window 308 on house 306 unobscured by person 304 despite that the main camera did not capture all of the pixels that would make up a view of window 308.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a system 400 for creating reconstructed imagery from captured imagery of a scene and arbitrary inputs captured from the scene. An advantage of allowing for arbitrary types of input is that preexisting devices or devices added for other purposes can be used for reconstruction. In part, system 400 can be used for reconstructing imagery for captured scenes when editing is done to remove objects from the scene that were present when captured. As illustrated, main camera video 402 is stored into main scene capture storage 404. Arbitrary inputs 406 can be obtained from other capture devices (mo-cap cameras, contrast cameras, stereo capture devices, Lidar, light sensors, environmental sensors, etc.). A preprocessor 410 obtains reference inputs 412, reference stage parameters 414, and capture device positions/settings 416 and processes those to generate normalizing parameters that can be stored in normalizing parameter storage 420.

Reference inputs 412 might include capture device readings obtained of a stage in the absence of objects. For example, a Lidar sensor might take readings of a stage to be able to determine distances to fixed backgrounds and the like, while an optical density capture device might measure a quiescent optical density in the absence of activity. Reference stage parameters 414 might include measurements made of the stage itself, such as its lighting independent of a capture device, which capture device positions/settings 416 might include calibration settings and positions of capture devices relative to a stage. It should be understood that the stage need not be a physical stage, but might be some other environment within which a scene to be captured can occur. For example, where a scene is to be shot of actors in battle outdoors, the stage might be an open field and the cameras and sensing devices might be placed relative to that open field to capture the visual action and capture device inputs.

Normalizing parameters are provided to a normalizer 430 that can process the arbitrary inputs 406 to generate normalized inputs, which can be stored in a normalized capture data storage 432. The normalized inputs might be such that they can be used to fill in portions of a stage in a scene that was captured with a main camera that are portions not captured in the main camera imagery due to being obscured by objects that are to be removed from the captured imagery. But one example of normalization would be to modify inputs from another image capture device that was capturing light from the scene while the main camera was capturing the main action, but where lighting, colors, and other factors would result in the other image capture device capturing pixel color values that are not matched with what would have been captured by the main camera for the plate but for the obscuring objects.

Reconstructing a plate from the main camera capture and normalized inputs from other capture devices might not be straightforward. In such cases, a machine-learning reconstructor 440 might take as inputs reconstruction parameters 442, reconstruction input selection 444, normalized capture data from storage 432, and main scene imagery from storage 404. Machine-learning reconstructor 440 might be trained on video with known values for what should be reconstructed. Once trained, machine-learning reconstructor 440 can output, from those inputs, reconstructed imagery 450. In an embodiment, reconstructed (i.e., modified) imagery 450 corresponds to the main camera video 402, but where portions of a scene that were obstructed by objects to be removed are reconstructed so as to appear as if those removed objects were not present in the scene when it was captured.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a process for reconstructing imagery from captured imagery of a scene and arbitrary inputs captured from the scene. The process might be used for plate reconstruction from inputs that are not necessarily tied to the details of a camera that is capturing a main view of the scene. The process might be performed by an image processing system or as part of a larger studio content creation system that might comprise a stage, props, cameras, objects on scene, computer processors, storage, and artist and other user interfaces for working with content that is captured within the studio content creation system. In examples below, the process will be described with reference to an imagery creation system capable of capturing images and/or video and modifying the resulting captured imagery, with or without human user input.

In a first step, step 502, the imagery creation system specifies reference stage parameters for capture devices. These parameters might relate to what capture devices are being used, where they are located, etc. These parameters might be provided by users based on experience or by the imagery creation system performing computations to determine what parameters might be needed.

In step 504, the imagery creation system configures capture devices, such as setting Lidar devices to a particular settings, zoom levels, etc.

In step 506, the imagery creation system processes the parameters and settings to try and normalize reference inputs. For example, where a low resolution camera is used as a witness camera to the side of a scene (e.g., witness camera 132), normalization might be to interpolate output of the witness camera in order to match a higher resolution of a main camera.

At step 508, the imagery creation system checks whether the reference inputs are normalizable. If not, the imagery creation system returns to step 502. As an example, the imagery creation system might determine that given the placement of various capture devices, it would not be possible to normalize outputs of those capture devices. An extreme case might be where witness cameras are placed such that some object entirely blocks their view. When returning to step 502, the imagery creation system might flag that as a problem to be corrected, or a human user such as a set layout manager might determine that the witness cameras should be repositioned and would specify different reference stage parameters to reflect the new positions.

If the imagery creation system determines that the scene is normalizable (or partly normalizable, or normalizable to within predetermined thresholds or ranges), the process continues at step 510 and the imagery creation system stores the determined normalizing parameters for later use, such as in storage 420 illustrated in FIG. 4. The imagery creation system can then, at step 512, capture stage inputs with a plurality of capture devices. For example, the scene can be acted out, recorded with a main camera and other data captured from the capture devices. Optionally, the imagery creation system might configure capture devices based on the normalization parameters (step 514). The imagery creation system can then, at step 516, normalize captured inputs using normalization parameters, obtain reconstruction selections (step 518), and reconstruct a plate based on the selections, the normalized captured inputs, and the reconstruction parameters (step 520). In some embodiments, previously recorded imagery or data can be used.

The various embodiments further can be implemented in a wide variety of operating environments, which in some cases can include one or more user computers, computing devices or processing devices that can be used to operate any of a number of applications. Such a system also can include a number of workstations running any of a variety of commercially available operating systems and other known applications. These devices also can include virtual devices such as virtual machines, hypervisors and other virtual devices capable of communicating via a network.

Note that, in the context of describing disclosed embodiments, unless otherwise specified, use of expressions regarding executable instructions (also referred to as code, applications, agents, etc.) performing operations that “instructions” do not ordinarily perform unaided (e.g., transmission of data, calculations, etc.) denotes that the instructions are being executed by a machine, thereby causing the machine to perform the specified operations.

According to one embodiment, the techniques described herein are implemented by one or more generalized computing systems programmed to perform the techniques pursuant to program instructions in firmware, memory, other storage, or a combination. Special-purpose computing devices may be used, such as desktop computer systems, portable computer systems, handheld devices, networking devices or any other device that incorporates hard-wired and/or program logic to implement the techniques.

For example, FIG. 6 illustrates an example of visual content generation system 600 as might be used to generate imagery in the form of still images and/or video sequences of images. Visual content generation system 600 might generate imagery of live action scenes, computer generated scenes, or a combination thereof. In a practical system, users are provided with tools that allow them to specify, at high levels and low levels where necessary, what is to go into that imagery. For example, a user might be an animation artist and might use the visual content generation system 600 to capture interaction between two human actors performing live on a sound stage and replace one of the human actors with a computer-generated anthropomorphic non-human being that behaves in ways that mimic the replaced human actor's movements and mannerisms, and then add in a third computer-generated character and background scene elements that are computer-generated, all in order to tell a desired story or generate desired imagery.

Still images that are output by the visual content generation system 600 might be represented in computer memory as pixel arrays, such as a two-dimensional array of pixel color values, each associated with a pixel having a position in a two-dimensional image array. Pixel color values might be represented by three or more (or fewer) color values per pixel, such as a red value, a green value, and a blue value (e.g., in RGB format). Dimensions of such a two-dimensional array of pixel color values might correspond to a preferred and/or standard display scheme, such as 1920-pixel columns by 1280-pixel rows. Images might or might not be stored in a compressed format, but either way, a desired image may be represented as a two-dimensional array of pixel color values. In another variation, images are represented by a pair of stereo images for three-dimensional presentations and in other variations, some of the image output, or all of it, might represent three-dimensional imagery instead of just two-dimensional views.

A stored video sequence might include a plurality of images such as the still images described above, but where each image of the plurality of images has a place in a timing sequence and the stored video sequence is arranged so that when each image is displayed in order, at a time indicated by the timing sequence, the display presents what appears to be moving and/or changing imagery. In one representation, each image of the plurality of images is a video frame having a specified frame number that corresponds to an amount of time that would elapse from when a video sequence begins playing until that specified frame is displayed. A frame rate might be used to describe how many frames of the stored video sequence are displayed per unit time. Example video sequences might include 24 frames per second (24 FPS), 50 FPS, 140 FPS, or other frame rates. In some embodiments, frames are interlaced or otherwise presented for display, but for clarity of description, in some examples, it is assumed that a video frame has one specified display time, but other variations might be contemplated.

One method of creating a video sequence is to simply use a video camera to record a live action scene, i.e., events that physically occur and can be recorded by a video camera. The events being recorded can be events to be interpreted as viewed (such as seeing two human actors talk to each other) and/or can include events to be interpreted differently due to clever camera operations (such as moving actors about a stage to make one appear larger than the other despite the actors actually being of similar build, or using miniature objects with other miniature objects so as to be interpreted as a scene containing life-sized objects).

Creating video sequences for story-telling or other purposes often calls for scenes that cannot be created with live actors, such as a talking tree, an anthropomorphic object, space battles, and the like. Such video sequences might be generated computationally rather than capturing light from live scenes. In some instances, an entirety of a video sequence might be generated computationally, as in the case of a computer-animated feature film. In some video sequences, it is desirable to have some computer-generated imagery and some live action, perhaps with some careful merging of the two.

While computer-generated imagery might be creatable by manually specifying each color value for each pixel in each frame, this is likely too tedious to be practical. As a result, a creator uses various tools to specify the imagery at a higher level. As an example, an artist might specify the positions in a scene space, such as a three-dimensional coordinate system, of objects and/or lighting, as well as a camera viewpoint, and a camera view plane. From that, a rendering engine could take all of those as inputs, and compute each of the pixel color values in each of the frames. In another example, an artist specifies position and movement of an articulated object having some specified texture rather than specifying the color of each pixel representing that articulated object in each frame.

In a specific example, a rendering engine performs ray tracing wherein a pixel color value is determined by computing which objects lie along a ray traced in the scene space from the camera viewpoint through a point or portion of the camera view plane that corresponds to that pixel. For example, a camera view plane might be represented as a rectangle having a position in the scene space that is divided into a grid corresponding to the pixels of the ultimate image to be generated, and if a ray defined by the camera viewpoint in the scene space and a given pixel in that grid first intersects a solid, opaque, blue object, that given pixel is assigned the color blue. Of course, for modern computer-generated imagery, determining pixel colors—and thereby generating imagery—can be more complicated, as there are lighting issues, reflections, interpolations, and other considerations.

As illustrated in FIG. 6, a live action capture system 602 captures a live scene that plays out on a stage 604. The live action capture system 602 is described herein in greater detail, but might include computer processing capabilities, image processing capabilities, one or more processors, program code storage for storing program instructions executable by the one or more processors, as well as user input devices and user output devices, not all of which are shown.

In a specific live action capture system, cameras 606(1) and 606(2) capture the scene, while in some systems, there might be other sensor(s) 608 that capture information from the live scene (e.g., infrared cameras, infrared sensors, motion capture (“mo-cap”) detectors, etc.). On the stage 604, there might be human actors, animal actors, inanimate objects, background objects, and possibly an object such as a green screen 610 that is designed to be captured in a live scene recording in such a way that it is easily overlaid with computer-generated imagery. The stage 604 might also contain objects that serve as fiducials, such as fiducials 612(1)-(3), that might be used post-capture to determine where an object was during capture. A live action scene might be illuminated by one or more lights, such as an overhead light 614.

During or following the capture of a live action scene, the live action capture system 602 might output live action footage to a live action footage storage 620. A live action processing system 622 might process live action footage to generate data about that live action footage and store that data into a live action metadata storage 624. The live action processing system 622 might include computer processing capabilities, image processing capabilities, one or more processors, program code storage for storing program instructions executable by the one or more processors, as well as user input devices and user output devices, not all of which are shown. The live action processing system 622 might process live action footage to determine boundaries of objects in a frame or multiple frames, determine locations of objects in a live action scene, where a camera was relative to some action, distances between moving objects and fiducials, etc. Where elements have sensors attached to them or are detected, the metadata might include location, color, and intensity of the overhead light 614, as that might be useful in post-processing to match computer-generated lighting on objects that are computer-generated and overlaid on the live action footage. The live action processing system 622 might operate autonomously, perhaps based on predetermined program instructions, to generate and output the live action metadata upon receiving and inputting the live action footage. The live action footage can be camera-captured data as well as data from other sensors.

An animation creation system 630 is another part of the visual content generation system 600. The animation creation system 630 might include computer processing capabilities, image processing capabilities, one or more processors, program code storage for storing program instructions executable by the one or more processors, as well as user input devices and user output devices, not all of which are shown. The animation creation system 630 might be used by animation artists, managers, and others to specify details, perhaps programmatically and/or interactively, of imagery to be generated. From user input and data from a database or other data source, indicated as a data store 632, the animation creation system 630 might generate and output data representing objects (e.g., a horse, a human, a ball, a teapot, a cloud, a light source, a texture, etc.) to an object storage 634, generate and output data representing a scene into a scene description storage 636, and/or generate and output data representing animation sequences to an animation sequence storage 638.

Scene data might indicate locations of objects and other visual elements, values of their parameters, lighting, camera location, camera view plane, and other details that a rendering engine 650 might use to render CGI imagery. For example, scene data might include the locations of several articulated characters, background objects, lighting, etc. specified in a two-dimensional space, three-dimensional space, or other dimensional space (such as a 2.5-dimensional space, three-quarter dimensions, pseudo-3D spaces, etc.) along with locations of a camera viewpoint and view place from which to render imagery. For example, scene data might indicate that there is to be a red, fuzzy, talking dog in the right half of a video and a stationary tree in the left half of the video, all illuminated by a bright point light source that is above and behind the camera viewpoint. In some cases, the camera viewpoint is not explicit, but can be determined from a viewing frustum. In the case of imagery that is to be rendered to a rectangular view, the frustum would be a truncated pyramid. Other shapes for a rendered view are possible and the camera view plane could be different for different shapes.

The animation creation system 630 might be interactive, allowing a user to read in animation sequences, scene descriptions, object details, etc. and edit those, possibly returning them to storage to update or replace existing data. As an example, an operator might read in objects from object storage into a baking processor that would transform those objects into simpler forms and return those to the object storage 634 as new or different objects. For example, an operator might read in an object that has dozens of specified parameters (movable joints, color options, textures, etc.), select some values for those parameters and then save a baked object that is a simplified object with now fixed values for those parameters.

Rather than requiring user specification of each detail of a scene, data from the data store 632 might be used to drive object presentation. For example, if an artist is creating an animation of a spaceship passing over the surface of the Earth, instead of manually drawing or specifying a coastline, the artist might specify that the animation creation system 630 is to read data from the data store 632 in a file containing coordinates of Earth coastlines and generate background elements of a scene using that coastline data.

Animation sequence data might be in the form of time series of data for control points of an object that has attributes that are controllable. For example, an object might be a humanoid character with limbs and joints that are movable in manners similar to typical human movements. An artist can specify an animation sequence at a high level, such as “the left hand moves from location (X1, Y1, Z1) to (X2, Y2, Z2) over time T1 to T2”, at a lower level (e.g., “move the elbow joint 2.5 degrees per frame”) or even at a very high level (e.g., “character A should move, consistent with the laws of physics that are given for this scene, from point P1 to point P2 along a specified path”).

Animation sequences in an animated scene might be specified by what happens in a live action scene. An animation driver generator 644 might read in live action metadata, such as data representing movements and positions of body parts of a live actor during a live action scene. The animation driver generator 644 might generate corresponding animation parameters to be stored in the animation sequence storage 638 for use in animating a CGI object. This can be useful where a live action scene of a human actor is captured while wearing mo-cap fiducials (e.g., high-contrast markers outside actor clothing, high-visibility paint on actor skin, face, etc.) and the movement of those fiducials is determined by the live action processing system 622. The animation driver generator 644 might convert that movement data into specifications of how joints of an articulated CGI character are to move over time.

A rendering engine 650 can read in animation sequences, scene descriptions, and object details, as well as rendering engine control inputs, such as a resolution selection and a set of rendering parameters. Resolution selection might be useful for an operator to control a trade-off between speed of rendering and clarity of detail, as speed might be more important than clarity for a movie maker to test some interaction or direction, while clarity might be more important than speed for a movie maker to generate data that will be used for final prints of feature films to be distributed. The rendering engine 650 might include computer processing capabilities, image processing capabilities, one or more processors, program code storage for storing program instructions executable by the one or more processors, as well as user input devices and user output devices, not all of which are shown.

The visual content generation system 600 can also include a merging system 660 that merges live footage with animated content. The live footage might be obtained and input by reading from the live action footage storage 620 to obtain live action footage, by reading from the live action metadata storage 624 to obtain details such as presumed segmentation in captured images segmenting objects in a live action scene from their background (perhaps aided by the fact that the green screen 610 was part of the live action scene), and by obtaining CGI imagery from the rendering engine 650.

A merging system 660 might also read data from rulesets for merging/combining storage 662. A very simple example of a rule in a ruleset might be “obtain a full image including a two-dimensional pixel array from live footage, obtain a full image including a two-dimensional pixel array from the rendering engine 650, and output an image where each pixel is a corresponding pixel from the rendering engine 650 when the corresponding pixel in the live footage is a specific color of green, otherwise output a pixel value from the corresponding pixel in the live footage.”

The merging system 660 might include computer processing capabilities, image processing capabilities, one or more processors, program code storage for storing program instructions executable by the one or more processors, as well as user input devices and user output devices, not all of which are shown. The merging system 660 might operate autonomously, following programming instructions, or might have a user interface or programmatic interface over which an operator can control a merging process. In some embodiments, an operator can specify parameter values to use in a merging process and/or might specify specific tweaks to be made to an output of the merging system 660, such as modifying boundaries of segmented objects, inserting blurs to smooth out imperfections, or adding other effects. Based on its inputs, the merging system 660 can output an image to be stored in a static image storage 670 and/or a sequence of images in the form of video to be stored in an animated/combined video storage 672.

Thus, as described, the visual content generation system 600 can be used to generate video that combines live action with computer-generated animation using various components and tools, some of which are described in more detail herein. While the visual content generation system 600 might be useful for such combinations, with suitable settings, it can be used for outputting entirely live action footage or entirely CGI sequences. The code may also be provided and/or carried by a transitory computer readable medium, e.g., a transmission medium such as in the form of a signal transmitted over a network.

According to one embodiment, the techniques described herein are implemented by one or generalized computing systems programmed to perform the techniques pursuant to program instructions in firmware, memory, other storage, or a combination. Special-purpose computing devices may be used, such as desktop computer systems, portable computer systems, handheld devices, networking devices or any other device that incorporates hard-wired and/or program logic to implement the techniques.

For example, FIG. 7 is a block diagram that illustrates a computer system 700 upon which the computer systems of the systems described herein and/or the visual content generation system 600 (see FIG. 6) may be implemented. The computer system 700 includes a bus 702 or other communication mechanism for communicating information, and a processor 704 coupled with the bus 702 for processing information. The processor 704 may be, for example, a general-purpose microprocessor.

The computer system 700 also includes a main memory 706, such as a random-access memory (RAM) or other dynamic storage device, coupled to the bus 702 for storing information and instructions to be executed by the processor 704. The main memory 706 may also be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions to be executed by the processor 704. Such instructions, when stored in non-transitory storage media accessible to the processor 704, render the computer system 700 into a special-purpose machine that is customized to perform the operations specified in the instructions.

The computer system 700 further includes a read only memory (ROM) 708 or other static storage device coupled to the bus 702 for storing static information and instructions for the processor 704. A storage device 710, such as a magnetic disk or optical disk, is provided and coupled to the bus 702 for storing information and instructions.

The computer system 700 may be coupled via the bus 702 to a display 712, such as a computer monitor, for displaying information to a computer user. An input device 714, including alphanumeric and other keys, is coupled to the bus 702 for communicating information and command selections to the processor 704. Another type of user input device is a cursor control 716, such as a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys for communicating direction information and command selections to the processor 704 and for controlling cursor movement on the display 712. This input device typically has two degrees of freedom in two axes, a first axis (e.g., x) and a second axis (e.g., y), that allows the device to specify positions in a plane.

The computer system 700 may implement the techniques described herein using customized hard-wired logic, one or more ASICs or FPGAs, firmware and/or program logic which in combination with the computer system causes or programs the computer system 700 to be a special-purpose machine. According to one embodiment, the techniques herein are performed by the computer system 700 in response to the processor 704 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained in the main memory 706. Such instructions may be read into the main memory 706 from another storage medium, such as the storage device 710. Execution of the sequences of instructions contained in the main memory 706 causes the processor 704 to perform the process steps described herein. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions.

The term “storage media” as used herein refers to any non-transitory media that store data and/or instructions that cause a machine to operation in a specific fashion. Such storage media may include non-volatile media and/or volatile media. Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as the storage device 710. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such as the main memory 706. Common forms of storage media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, solid state drive, magnetic tape, or any other magnetic data storage medium, a CD-ROM, any other optical data storage medium, any physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, an EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, NVRAM, any other memory chip or cartridge.

Storage media is distinct from but may be used in conjunction with transmission media. Transmission media participates in transferring information between storage media. For example, transmission media includes coaxial cables, copper wire, and fiber optics, including the wires that include the bus 702. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio-wave and infra-red data communications.

Various forms of media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to the processor 704 for execution. For example, the instructions may initially be carried on a magnetic disk or solid-state drive of a remote computer. The remote computer can load the instructions into its dynamic memory and send the instructions over a network connection. A modem or network interface local to the computer system 700 can receive the data. The bus 702 carries the data to the main memory 706, from which the processor 704 retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by the main memory 706 may optionally be stored on the storage device 710 either before or after execution by the processor 704.

The computer system 700 also includes a communication interface 718 coupled to the bus 702. The communication interface 718 provides a two-way data communication coupling to a network link 720 that is connected to a local network 722. For example, the communication interface 718 may be a network card, a modem, a cable modem, or a satellite modem to provide a data communication connection to a corresponding type of telephone line or communications line. Wireless links may also be implemented. In any such implementation, the communication interface 718 sends and receives electrical, electromagnetic, or optical signals that carry digital data streams representing various types of information.

The network link 720 typically provides data communication through one or more networks to other data devices. For example, the network link 720 may provide a connection through the local network 722 to a host computer 724 or to data equipment operated by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 726. The ISP 726 in turn provides data communication services through the world-wide packet data communication network now commonly referred to as the “Internet” 728. The local network 722 and Internet 728 both use electrical, electromagnetic, or optical signals that carry digital data streams. The signals through the various networks and the signals on the network link 720 and through the communication interface 718, which carry the digital data to and from the computer system 700, are example forms of transmission media.

The computer system 700 can send messages and receive data, including program code, through the network(s), the network link 720, and communication interface 718. In the Internet example, a server 730 might transmit a requested code for an application program through the Internet 728, ISP 726, local network 722, and communication interface 718. The received code may be executed by the processor 704 as it is received, and/or stored in the storage device 710, or other non-volatile storage for later execution.

Operations of processes described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. Processes described herein (or variations and/or combinations thereof) may be performed under the control of one or more computer systems configured with executable instructions and may be implemented as code (e.g., executable instructions, one or more computer programs or one or more applications) executing collectively on one or more processors, by hardware or combinations thereof. The code may be stored on a computer-readable storage medium, for example, in the form of a computer program comprising a plurality of instructions executable by one or more processors. The computer-readable storage medium may be non-transitory. The code may also be provided carried by a transitory computer readable medium e.g., a transmission medium such as in the form of a signal transmitted over a network.

Conjunctive language, such as phrases of the form “at least one of A, B, and C,” or “at least one of A, B and C,” unless specifically stated otherwise or otherwise clearly contradicted by context, is otherwise understood with the context as used in general to present that an item, term, etc., may be either A or B or C, or any nonempty subset of the set of A and B and C. For instance, in the illustrative example of a set having three members, the conjunctive phrases “at least one of A, B, and C” and “at least one of A, B and C” refer to any of the following sets: {A}, {B}, {C}, {A, B}, {A, C}, {B, C}, {A, B, C}. Thus, such conjunctive language is not generally intended to imply that certain embodiments require at least one of A, at least one of B and at least one of C each to be present.

The use of examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate embodiments of the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.

In the foregoing specification, embodiments of the invention have been described with reference to numerous specific details that may vary from implementation to implementation. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. The sole and exclusive indicator of the scope of the invention, and what is intended by the applicants to be the scope of the invention, is the literal and equivalent scope of the set of claims that issue from this application, in the specific form in which such claims issue, including any subsequent correction.

Further embodiments can be envisioned to one of ordinary skill in the art after reading this disclosure. In other embodiments, combinations or sub-combinations of the above-disclosed invention can be advantageously made. The example arrangements of components are shown for purposes of illustration and combinations, additions, re-arrangements, and the like are contemplated in alternative embodiments of the present invention. Thus, while the invention has been described with respect to exemplary embodiments, one skilled in the art will recognize that numerous modifications are possible.

For example, the processes described herein may be implemented using hardware components, software components, and/or any combination thereof. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereunto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the claims and that the invention is intended to cover all modifications and equivalents within the scope of the following claims.

All references, including publications, patent applications, and patents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference were individually and specifically indicated to be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entirety herein. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer-implemented method of reconstructing a plate by processing images of a scene from a main imaging device using capture device inputs from capture devices recording the same scene, the method comprising: receiving reference stage parameters associated with the capture devices; receiving main input from the main imaging device, including a primary object that is at least partially obscuring an obscured object; receiving the capture device inputs from the capture devices; identifying a plate for reconstruction that includes the primary object; aligning two or more captured inputs; obtaining reconstruction selections in the identified plate to remove the primary object from the plate; and reconstructing the plate based on the selections, the aligned captured inputs, and the reconstruction selections to form a reconstructed plate showing the portions of the obscured object that were obscured by the primary object.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the main imaging device includes a camera, the method further comprising: replacing pixels in digitized video content captured with the camera to modify a captured scene in the digitized video content, wherein pixel color values of replaced pixels are determined based, at least in part, on the reconstruction selections and the capture device inputs.
 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising: determining objects to be removed from the captured scene; and using results of determining for a plate reconstruction.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the reference stage parameters relate at least in part to what capture devices are being used and differences between the capture devices and the main imaging device.
 5. The method of claim 1, the capture devices comprising: one or more of a first camera having a resolution different than the main imaging device and/or a second camera optimized for a spectrum different than that of the main imaging device.
 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising: configuring the capture devices based on normalization parameters.
 7. An apparatus for reconstructing a plate by processing images of a scene from a main imaging device using capture device inputs from capture devices recording the same scene, the apparatus comprising: one or more processors; one or more non-transitory processor-readable media including instructions executable by the one or more processors for: receiving reference stage parameters associated with the capture devices; receiving main input from the main imaging device, including a primary object that is at least partially obscuring an obscured object; receiving the capture device inputs from the capture devices; identifying a plate for reconstruction that includes the primary object; aligning two or more captured inputs; obtaining reconstruction selections in the identified plate to remove the primary object from the plate; and reconstructing the plate based on the selections, the aligned captured inputs, and the reconstruction selections to form a reconstructed plate showing the portions of the obscured object that were obscured by the primary object.
 8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the main imaging device includes a camera, the apparatus further comprising: replacing pixels in digitized video content captured with the camera to modify a captured scene in the digitized video content, wherein pixel color values of replaced pixels are determined based, at least in part, on the reconstruction selections and the capture device inputs.
 9. The apparatus of claim 8, further comprising: determining objects to be removed from the captured scene; and using results of determining for a plate reconstruction.
 10. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the reference stage parameters relate at least in part to what capture devices are being used and differences between the capture devices and the main imaging device.
 11. The apparatus of claim 7, the capture devices comprising: one or more of a first camera having a resolution different than the main imaging device and/or a second camera optimized for a spectrum different than that of the main imaging device.
 12. The apparatus of claim 7, further comprising: configuring the capture devices based on normalization parameters.
 13. A non-transitory processor-readable medium for reconstructing a plate by processing images of a scene from a main imaging device using capture device inputs from capture devices recording the same scene, the non-transitory processor-readable medium including instructions executable by one or more processors for: receiving reference stage parameters associated with the capture devices; receiving main input from the main imaging device, including a primary object that is at least partially obscuring an obscured object; receiving the capture device inputs from the capture devices; identifying a plate for reconstruction that includes the primary object; aligning two or more captured inputs; obtaining reconstruction selections in the identified plate to remove the primary object from the plate; and reconstructing the plate based on the selections, the aligned captured inputs, and the reconstruction selections to form a reconstructed plate showing the portions of the obscured object that were obscured by the primary object.
 14. The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the main imaging device includes a camera, further comprising: replacing pixels in digitized video content captured with the camera to modify a captured scene in the digitized video content, wherein pixel color values of replaced pixels are determined based, at least in part, on the reconstruction selections and the capture device inputs.
 15. The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 14, further comprising: determining objects to be removed from the captured scene; and using results of determining for a plate reconstruction.
 16. The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the reference stage parameters relate at least in part to what capture devices are being used and differences between the capture devices and the main imaging device.
 17. The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 13, the capture devices comprising: one or more of a first camera having a resolution different than the main imaging device and/or a second camera optimized for a spectrum different than that of the main imaging device.
 18. The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 13, further comprising: configuring the capture devices based on normalization parameters.
 19. The method of claim 18, wherein a normalization parameter includes a resolution of a particular capture device.
 20. The method of claim 19, further comprising: upscaling the resolution of the at least one of the capture devices to cause images captured by the particular capture device to be closer to a resolution of the main imaging device. 